Relationship between religion and society in John Rawls: A comparison with the doctrine of Vatican II Concile
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Este artículo estudia la compatibilidad de John Rawls con la visión del pensamiento social católico sobre la libertad religiosa. Primeramente distingue las fases del pensamiento de Rawls a lo largo de su vida siguiendo la postura expresada en sus diferentes obras. Se puede así apreciar una progresiva apertura a la contribución de la religión a la vida pública. Posteriormente introduce la posición católica por medio del documento del Vaticano II Dignitatis humanae. La comparación de ambas posturas revela que existe una compatibilidad práctica entre las dos, pero a la vez revela también la existencia de diferencias producto de las distintas antropologías implícitas. Éstas son la causa de una tensión entre ambas posiciones que tiende a distanciarlas.
Downloads
Article Details
The authors acknowledge that the Revista de Fomento Social assumes as its own the intellectual property rights over their work and grant the journal the permissions of distribution and public communication of the same established in the Berlin, Bethesda and Budapest declarations; for this reason they accept that the work presented be distributed in open access, protecting the copyright under a "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivativeWorks 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) license.
You may copy, use, disseminate, transmit and publicly display provided that:
Cite the authorship of the work, the publication in Revista de Fomento Social, issue, year and the pages where you found the information.
No commercial benefit may be obtained.
No derivative works may be made for commercial purposes that are not authorized by the journal.
Authors are encouraged to disseminate the article electronically (Revista de Fomento Social, number, year, pagination, ISSN, DOI, etc.), in order to favor its circulation and diffusion, increase its citation and reach among the academic community.
The information of the journal will be provided to Dulcinea
References
GRIFFIN, L., (2005) “Commentary on Dignitatis humanae (Declaration on Religious Freedom)” en HIMES, K., ET ALL. (ED.) Modern Catholic social teaching. Commentaries and Interpretatios, Washington, Georgetown University, pp. 244–265.
HEYER, K. E., (2006) Prophetic and public. The social witness of U.S. Cattholicism, Washington, Georgetown University.
HOLLENBACH, D., (1994) “Public Reason/Private Religion? A Response to Paul J. Weithman”: Journal of Religious Ethics, nº 22, primavera, pp. 39–46.
— (2003) The global face of public faith: politics, human rights, and Christian ethics, Washington, Georgetown University.
MARTÍNEZ, J. L., (2003) “Debate con John Rawls: Sobre el contenido de la libertad religiosa”: Iglesia Viva nº 213, pp. 91–106.
— (2011) “Religión en la democracia liberal: Debate entre Rawls, Habermas y Ratzinger”: Estudios Eclesiásticos nº 337, pp. 291–327.
RAWLS, J., (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge (MA), Belknap.
— (2005) Political Liberalism, Nueva York, Columbia University.
RICO, H., (2002) John Paul II and the legacy of Dignitas humanae, Washington, Georgetown University.
SARKOZY, N. (2008) “Discurso del presidente de la República en Letrán”: Revista de Fomento Social 63, pp. 141–149
THOMASSET A., (2004) “Le catholicisme dans la sphère publique”: Projet hors– série, septiembre, pp. 89–94.
WEITHMAN, P. J., (1994) “Rawlsian liberalism and the privatization of religion: three theological objections considered”: Journal of Religious Ethics, nº 22, primavera, pp. 3–28.