Utopia or leviathan. Role of the state in social teaching and liberal thought

Main Article Content

Gonzalo Villagrán medina

Abstract

The current crisis situation forces us to ask ourselves about the limits of the Welfare State of well–being of Western societies. In order to illuminate this reflection this article presents the reflection on the role of the State in society as it has developed in the social teaching. To help realize these intuitions then are put in dialogue with two liberal school thinkers: Friedrich Hayek and Amartya Sen. This dialogue will help us understand the incompatibility of the position of the social teaching with liberal radical positions by assume are a vision of man and society opposed to the Catholic social tradition. On the other hand, the vision of Sen is very compatible and you can help us to develop principles of discernment to judge the presence of the State in society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Villagrán medina, G. (2014). Utopia or leviathan. Role of the state in social teaching and liberal thought. Revista De Fomento Social, (273-274), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.32418/rfs.2014.273-274.1681
Section
Studies

References

Calvez, J.–Y. (1991) La enseñanza social de la Iglesia. La economía. El hombre. La sociedad, Barcelona, Herder.

Camacho, I. (1991) Doctrina social de la Iglesia. Una aproximación histórica, Madrid, San Pablo.

Deck, A. F. (2005) “Commentary on Populorum Progressio (On the Development of People)” en Himes, K., et all. (ed.) Modern Catholic Social Thinking: Commentary and Interpretations, Washington D.C., Georgetown University Press, pp. 292–314.

Dubois, J.–L. y Renouard C. (2008) “Une Approche à Poursuivre... et à Dépasser”: Projet nº 306, pp. 12–19.

Finn, D. K. (2005) “Commentary on Centesimus Annus (On the Hundred Anniversary of Rerum Novarum)” en Himes, K. et all. (ed.) Modern Catholic Social Thinking: Commentary and Interpretations, Washington D.C., Georgetown University Press, pp. 436–466.

Font, J. I. (2009) “Sistema económico, modelos de empresa y cultural empresarial”: Revista de Fomento Social nº 64, pp. 655–666.

Giraud, G. y Dubois, J.–L. (2008) “Amartya Sen. L’économie d’‘acteurs capables’”: Projet nº 306, pp. 4–11.

González Fabre, R. (2005) Ética y economía. Una ética para economistas y entendidos en economía, Bilbao, Desclée de Brouwer–UNIJES.

Hayek, F. A. (1985) Camino de servidumbre, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.

— (1979) Derecho, legislación y libertad. El espejismo de la justicia social. Vol. 2, Madrid, Unión Editorial.

Laurent, B. (2010) “Caritas in Veritate as a Social Encyclical: A Modest Challenge to Economic, Social, and Political Institutions”: Theological Studies nº 71 (2010),
pp. 515–544.

Légé, P. (2008) “Critique de la justice sociale selon Hayek”: Projet nº 303, pp. 57–62.

Maritain, J. (1983) El hombre y el Estado, Madrid, Encuentro.

Mich, M. L. (2005) “Commentary on Mater et Magistra (Christianity and Social Progress)” en Himes, K., et all. (ed.) Modern Catholic Social Thinking: Commentary and Interpretations, Washington D.C., Georgetown University Press, pp. 191–216.

Ornaghi, L., (2004) “Stato” en Ornaghi, L. (Ed.), Dizionario di dottrina sociale de la Chiesa. Scienze sociali e magisterio, Milan, Vita e Pensiero, pp. 588–592.

Orobator, A. (2010) “Caritas in Veritate and Africa’s Burden of (Under)Development”: Theological Studies nº 71, pp. 320–334.

Sen, A. (2000) Desarrollo y libertad, Barcelona, Planeta.

The Economist (2010) “The Growth of the State: Leviathan Stirs Again”, www. economist.com/node/15328727.